I have a problem. I am developing a plot of land for building houses. The Water Directorate has already imposed a condition on me, during the process of obtaining the RDP, to arrange the erosion protection of a part of a small watercourse. Part of this protection is the construction of two cross-sills. I have obtained a water consent for the development, with a height of 30 cm. I have obtained a water consent for the development and I have concluded an agreement with the Water Directorate on the regulation of mutual relations for the construction of water infrastructure. This contract obliges me to construct two transverse sills (height 30 cm) in addition to protecting the bank with a stone formwork, which will be on my land. The problem arose when the UE Kranj refused my request for a building permit for the construction of the infrastructure, as according to them the contract does not prove the right to build, although Article 56 of the PGI also allows other documents as proof that authorise construction. The UE requires the acquisition of an easement or building right and registration in the land register, which as a natural person on state property I cannot obtain. The explanation of the Water Directorate did not help either. The UE is standing its ground. I have been informed of a similar case where the appeal was dropped at second instance. So I have no use even for an appeal and practically no solution. Let me say that the value of the works that would be carried out on the water land is up to a thousand euros, and the whole project of building houses is costing me. Who will pay for the damage? It would be necessary to harmonise Article 153a of the Water Act and Article 56 of the PGI, and the administrators would also have to work in accordance with Article 7 of the PGI, as well as in accordance with common sense, because there would be no consequences if they decided otherwise.