Hello.
Please explain what the changes are in the area highlighted below.
We can also say exactly the same as has already been said in one of the initiatives on STOP Bureaucracy.  This is the first time we have seen a safety plan in 13 years of working in the construction industry. In that time, we have had 650 investors, of whom this year was the first to draw up a safety plan, and even this one was brought to our attention because it was an industrial facility. The safety plan was, of course, not in line with our machinery stock and contained some other machinery that we do not have, but we did not go into that.   There is far too little monitoring and punishment of investors and supervisors, who are obliged to work with paperwork and also to comply with legislation, which they are not.   And the reason why is because we contractors are a better milking machine for penalties.    Contractors work on the ground and do not do paperwork, please take this into account when writing the various regulations. In general, penalise everyone equally for the same offence, but not at most Ltd's, semi-major Ltd's and something symbolic for individuals.
Work on your own
In this country, self-employed work is done by the investor paying at least one foreman or a couple of other cheap Macedonians or colleagues, not by doing it for free.  Only no invoices are issued because the whole thing of doing it yourself is cheaper for the investor to do. 99% of people hire someone because they don't know how to do it themselves.  Of course, of those hired to do the work themselves, none of them have a trade licence, no building insurance, no medical check, no occupational safety. Neither are the machines inspected, nor are there any contributions, nor is the construction site insured.   We pointed this out in Zreče last year, but the Ministry's representatives care little for the contractors, putting them in a completely unequal position.   If they were smart, they would have put in the new law that the own directorate must have a contract with at least 1 person who meets the legal requirements to be a contractor or the responsible manager of individual works, not a supervisor. This would also speed up the process for folk who don't have these papers to get them and get them sorted out. And the investor would have a quality contractor. A supervisor is completely unnecessary for self-performance, because people need a foreman to work with, not to look at papers. And they will hire a foreman, it's just that it will be illegal instead of legal.  They do not hire a supervisor even when the contractor is doing the work legally, because it is an unnecessary cost of a few thousand euros, which is realistic. We can tell you this from experience.  Moreover, it is also unfair that the contractor has to prepare all the documentation for the proof of reliability, which is mainly used for certain industrial or large agricultural installations. This should be prepared by the supervisor, because the matter is needed by the client and is of an administrative nature, not of an implementation nature.  The contractor only has to provide him with all the evidence for the materials installed and the tests, not physically write a tabular list of evidence with all the numbers, dates, etc., and a statement, annexes, etc., as if he were the project manager.  And this is completely free of charge.  This places an excessive burden on us, especially when many contractors (micro or mini-companies) do not even have an administrator on staff.   Last time we wrote this we needed a week, in between we sent 3x to the supervisor for review.  Why are you even burdening us with this? Why is it not written by the supervisor, who is the only one who knows what it should be? The contractor should read, sign and deliver to the supervisor the proofs for his materials and services.   We have had to keep this for other contractors, because the building work is the main part, the electrical and mechanical work is the minor part, and there will be one proof altogether. That is not our job at all. Problems arise simply because they are not managed by the supervisor, who is the only one who controls the whole project.