Hello.
We have quite a few non-payers/cheats, but nothing happens to them in this system. The system is totally inefficient and imposes costs only on the creditor. If there is no solution, the problems of the creditors from the State side are only increasing, because the State is also passing on all the costs to the creditors, instead of claiming them from the debtors and therefore suffering the same as the creditor. Since the State does not experience the problem first-hand, because it is always repaid, it does not understand it and does not solve it. Improvement measures requested:- the court only ex officio informs the creditor of the order-pending nature of the enforcement case.- if the debtor does not attend the hearing, the threat should be imprisonment for the person responsible, not a fine which is not recoverable.- transfers of property by owners who have debts can be prevented in the process of overwriting or subsequently reversed, as this is done deliberately.- the prosecution must not dismiss the actions of small debtors/creditors, but must prosecute faithfully and convict and imprison the person. And not just imprisoned for fraud, e.g. for 1 year, but until all creditors have been paid. It makes no sense for these people to be at large, as they only increase the damage to the economy, because they see that it is possible to live nicely from fraud without punishment and without repayment.- Prison should also be the conclusion that the execution has not been paid (go to prison or pay up, or pay up from prison until all creditors have been paid). Maybe we should open a "factory" just for such debtors, who would use their work to pay off the debtors.To highlight examples:1. You give the debtor a writ of execution. You get a final order. No money after 1 year. You make an enquiry to the bank you are in the queue of and get an agreement that the 25th. You pay the bank €6 for the answer. You have no repayment. You make a request for an inventory of the assets to put a writ of execution on something else. The debtor does not submit the inventory. The court calls a hearing, which the debtor does not attend. The fine imposed on the debtor is a futile measure because it cannot be recovered anyway, just as the debtor cannot recover the underlying claim.2. You give the debtor the writ of execution, he objects and the case goes to court. The creditor wins the lawsuit, but the debtor does not pay. You give him the execution, but there is no repayment because he has everything signed over to someone else (wife, child, aunt, relatives, mistress, etc.).I suggest that you adopt a regulation that annuls all transfers of property in the case of unpaid debts and at least from the time of the proposal. 3. You file a criminal complaint for fraud against the debtor because he has been lying to you for 2 years that he will pay you back and he hasn't. The police and the prosecutor's office have been working on the case for, say, 6 months. In the end, you get a decision from the prosecutor's office that the criminal complaint should be dismissed because of the disproportionality between the minor importance of the acts and the consequences that would be caused by the prosecution. Which means that e.g. a 300e debt is not worth prosecuting and that the creditor has to sue the debtor and therefore spend even more money. The auction house does not want to help me with this at its own expense. This is how fraud and non-payment are massively supported, because for most fraudsters it works out fine.