Hello.
 
Enforcements of debtors who appeal against enforcement are ex officio pursued through court proceedings. Of course, this entails additional costs for all involved. Most of the time, creditors succeed in their lawsuits but do not receive any money. For the court, the case is successfully closed. In order to actually repay the debt and the costs of the proceedings, the creditors have to apply to the court again, this time on the basis of a judgment. The first enforcement action is brought on the basis of a credible document. If the debtor fails to pay, the enforcement agent must be activated, which is a new cost position and still without a guarantee of repayment. So, unnecessarily, enforcement is a burden on the creditor, who has to go through three procedures for one case.We believe that the court should decide in the first instance on the debtor's obligation to pay, and the decision should be enforceable immediately, with the full obligation and responsibility to pay, one way or another, as there are state instruments to do so, without shifting the responsibility onto the already aggrieved and helpless creditors.Just as the DURS has been successful in recovering unpaid taxes, so too should the judiciary adapt itself to ensure that debtors in the economy are recovered as quickly as possible and, above all, enforceably. Debtors are one of the biggest destroyers of businesses, alongside passive economic policy.