Area: Javna uprava
Competent authority: MNZ, MP
EZU URL: .nan
Initiative ID: 145
Initiative accepted and completed: '2013-08-07'
Initiative classified in EZU: .nan
Initiative forwarded in response: '2013-06-19'
Initiative published: '2013-06-19'
Initiative submitted: '2013-06-16'
Response from the competent authority: ' Answer from the Ministry of Justice: the
  Court Register, the information to be entered in the Court Register, and the rules
  of procedure for the competent court to decide on the entry in the Court Register
  are regulated by the Act on the Court Register (hereinafter: the "ZSReg"). Pursuant
  to Article 13 of the ZSReg, the procedure for entry in the Court Register is expeditious,
  and the court is obliged to deal with the cases in the order in which they are received,
  unless special circumstances require otherwise. Article 20 of the ZSReg provides
  that, unless otherwise specifically provided, the court in the territory of which
  the seat of the registration subject is located (the court of registration) shall
  have jurisdiction to decide on entries in the commercial register in respect of
  a particular registration subject, unless otherwise specifically provided. In the
  case of registration of new registration entities resulting from the division of
  a registration entity, the court with which the registration entity being divided
  is registered shall have jurisdiction to register it in accordance with Article
  21 of the ZSReg.In view of the fact that the ZSReg prescribes the same rules of
  procedure and the same court procedures irrespective of which court has territorial
  jurisdiction in a particular case, we consider that the reasons for the allegedly
  significantly different handling of similar cases in different courts in terms of
  time are not to be found in the normative regulation itself, but in its implementation,
  or in the organisation of the implementation of the normative regulation in the
  individual courts. We therefore brought the allegations in the petition to the attention
  of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, which explained that the situation
  at the District Court in Celje, as described in the petition under consideration,
  was due to insufficient staffing, which was reflected in the length of time taken
  to resolve registration cases, but only in a short period of time. The staffing
  of the District Court in Celje is now in order, and registration cases are now being
  resolved in accordance with the applicable provisions of the ZSReg, or in a comparable
  time compared to other district courts in Slovenia.'
Text file: 145.txt
Title: Issuing of a decision for newly established companies
URL: https://www.stopbirokraciji.gov.si/pobuda/?st=145
