Hello.
I would like to know why the administrative units do not take into account Article 35(3) of the General Law: '3) In the case of the planned construction of public utility infrastructure facilities to be carried out in the road body of a public road, including connections, the consent of the public road operator for the construction to be carried out in the road body shall be deemed to be the evidence referred to in paragraph 3 of the preceding subparagraph, notwithstanding the provisions of this Article'. Despite the fact that the construction of the public utility infrastructure is carried out in the road body of a categorised road and the consent of the road manager (municipality) is obtained, the administrative unit requires the easement rights of all the actual owners in order to issue the GD, which is impracticable due to the unregulated ownership. The road cadastre almost nowhere corresponds to the actual situation on the ground. So why does this article even exist if it cannot be used for the construction of GGI (electricity, water supply, etc.)?