We often read in the media and other newsletters that the report is not public because it is not yet final, because stakeholders have not yet reacted to it, etc. The Court of Auditors' report on the procurement of medical equipment is currently being discussed. I propose that all reports and the whole process of state bodies, agencies, offices, etc., etc., should be made public. We know from abroad the process where a draft is made public and everyone (not only those involved) has the opportunity to comment on it - which is also made public (for sensitive information, the proponent indicates that it is blacked out), and the whole process that follows is also made public - the body's response to the comments and their consideration in the final report, the final report (including any additional comments on the final report). This ensures (1) transparency of the authorities' action, (2) public interest in information and accessibility, (3) very clear influence of individuals and groups on the final report (lobbying), (4) public exchange of arguments allowing an impartial assessment by each individual of the content of the report, (5) quality of the authorities' action as they are constantly under public scrutiny. But now we have a system where there is speculation about the content of the report, it is not clear who is influencing the report and in what way, we have problems with the service of mail and summonses, etc.