Hello, the Employment Service replies to applications for reimbursement of waiting time allowances by saying that, without exception, you must provide a declaration that your waiting time has not been interrupted. There is no basis for such a declaration in the IWLSA, only the basis for informing the Employment Service in the event of interruption. There is no basis, however, for a specific declaration that there has been no interruption. This unnecessarily prolongs the procedures considerably. The Institute also requires employers to submit an application for each month in order to prolong the validity of the provisions of the IUUPDV for one month. In doing so, it strictly adheres to the 8 day time limit. All of this makes no sense if workers are waiting all the time and the waiting has not actually been interrupted. It would be much simpler if the employer did not enter the end date of the waiting period in the first application, and consequently no new applications would be necessary, since the employer has to inform the Employment Service of the interruption of the waiting period in any case. The Employment Service goes further and, for example, requires waiting orders relating only to September as an annex to the application for September, even though these are not required under the ZDR-1 (nor under the ZIUPDV) if the worker has been on the waiting list for a long time. There is no need to issue the worker with a new order for September if the old one, which came into force earlier, is still in force. Such practices are not in the spirit of helping the economy, and the Institute should check the correctness of applications on the basis of the IHIRPA, not on the basis of unnecessary requirements which cause additional work and also concrete harm to employers.