For the construction of public utility infrastructure in the road body, there is Article 35, paragraph 3 of the GZ: (3) Notwithstanding the provisions of this Article, in the case of the intended construction of public utility infrastructure facilities to be carried out in the road body of a public road, including connections, the consent of the public road operator for the execution of the construction in the road body shall be deemed to be the proof referred to in paragraph 3 of the preceding paragraph. I would like to know why neither municipalities nor administrative units take this Article into account? For example, if a GSI is being built on the edge of a road that is part of the road body (bank, bank) and the lassoing is not regulated, the municipality refuses to mention these plots in the consent, even though they are part of the road body. On the other hand, even if the municipality issues a consent, the administrative unit requires the right to build from the private owners.