I propose to amend the Act on the calculation of the contribution for disabled persons for not reaching the quota, or the methodology which currently provides for calculation from the number of employees based on the data of registered employees according to M-1 and to update it during the time when the employer can provide work to employees. It is true that this has not been the case so far, but with the emergence of the Covid 19 pandemic, some employers are not in a position to comply with the NIJZ guidelines - to provide work for more than 5 months - first with a government order prohibiting employees from carrying out their activity and after 31.05.2020 due to the specific activity (culture and entertainment). At a time when the State subsidises the compensation for employees waiting at home, the Disability Fund sends us reminders and threatens to enforce the contributions for the time when we are not active and do not generate any income. The fact that we have kept workers in employment is already a huge burden for us at a time of partial subsidy, given that we have no income. The Invalidity Fund uses the excuse that it is not competent and, instead of sending us a written reply or a specific direction to another address, it sends us reminders and threatens us with enforcement. Logically, it seems to me that if the wage compensation, or part of the wage compensation of employees, is a charge to the State (not without reason), it could (if not in the Employment, Rehabilitation and Employment of Disabled Persons Act) be temporarily regulated in the Covid 19 Intervention Act. If the Government has issued a temporary restraining order, it is most logical that the economic operator, even if it wanted to, would not be able to employ the disabled person or any other additional worker for the whole time that it receives the subsidy for workers waiting for work at home. Economic operators for such undefined trifles, which are undefined in the conditions of non-operation and for which the simplest logical interpretation would be the most appropriate, rather than the formal part referred to in the individual legislation. In addition to the fact that we have no staff to work with, we are forced to cancel all the Ministries in the RS so that we can even find out who is competent to answer and resolve the problem. The problem is exactly the same with the Building Land Charge. I believe that if an entity has ceased to carry on business or has been banned from business premises on the basis of a government order, the said contribution should be exempted by decision for the time when it is not generating revenue and suffers major economic damage, as long as there are grounds for this.