I fully subscribe to the view that, since this activity is even more impossible than fighting windmills, natural sun time can be left alone without worry, as can, for example, the movement of the planets, and efforts can be directed instead towards shorter working hours, i.e. starting later in the morning and finishing earlier in the evening (while at the same time even guaranteeing a universal basic income (UBI) for all citizens, so that they will no longer even need working time to survive in this country).

	Such efforts are logical, human and therefore normal. Greed and envy are also human to such an extent that they are quite normal, if not logical, but let us leave that for the moment!

	Has anyone seen a post or discussion anywhere about what the point of moving the clock or "time" is? More or less, there are only arguments about which time is "better" and which should be "kept", winter or summer.

	I ask myself: 'Why would employers want workers to start work an hour earlier in the summer, when it is already light outside?' I think it is so that work is done an hour earlier that would otherwise not be done until an hour later. And that's without the cost of turning on the lights. So the motive is both economically logical and humanly normal. But then why do employers not simply tell workers to get to work an hour earlier in the summer, because it makes more economic sense?

	Yes, because they are not allowed to do that. This is because they are antagonising the workers (who generally prefer to work less and later), and they are expecting them to revolt, at a much higher cost. Employers estimate that workers would not let their current right to get up an hour later be taken away.

	That is why a wise man once remarked: "If we cannot force workers to come to work an hour earlier than we would like, we will nominally move their clock back. That way, they will arrive at work at the same time numerically and clockswise, but they will have to get up and start work an hour earlier. They will have no proof that they have arrived at work one hour earlier, because they will be told: 'Yes, just look at the clock'."

	What if, by analogy, in the summer, the legal time at five o'clock (solar time) in the morning was already eight o'clock and they had to start work, but then the bosses commanded that the hours during the day were longer than they actually were, so that in the evening at eight o'clock (solar time) the time was only four o'clock in the afternoon? The night hours would, of course, be commanded to be shorter because of the twenty-four-hour total. So we would be working as the employers want us to work, officially eight hours, but in reality 16 hours, which is dawn to dusk.

 
	To ensure that there are no more such contrivances, I propose to the Government natural, sunny or so-called 'winter' time, according to which the shortest shadow at midday points north. Maybe they have also stopped banging this drum to the children in primary school and to the scouts in line with the shifted clocks.