The fact is that with the rise of mass tourism, some cities are turning into movie sets that are practically unlivable, both because of the crowds and the rising cost of living. Examples of such cities in our area are Dubrovnik and Venice.
Ljubljana is well on its way to joining these cities, as property prices are skyrocketing, particularly because many properties are being rented out to tourists on a short-term basis via Airbnb and similar services, which can of course make good money with such high demand and without serious regulation. It does not help someone living in a 50 m2 socialist apartment in Ljubljana, which Gurs values at €150 000, that his neighbours in the block are making good money from short-term rentals, because he lives in that apartment, just like someone in Celje or Maribor. Yet the owner of a Ljubljana property will have to pay considerably more property tax, because Ljubljana has become a desirable tourist destination.
Since there is a shortage of residential property, my suggestion is that the law should limit the number of properties available for short-term letting in such 'tourist destinations', or that appropriate quotas should be set, because otherwise it may happen that Ljubljana is added to the film sets in a few years' time. Only then it will be a dead city, full of tourists working and eating in expensive restaurants and living in retro socialist apartment blocks via Airbnb, which I do not think anyone should want.
Following a sensible suggestion to amend the proposal in one of the comments (Robida), I add this amendment to the proposal to facilitate the implementation of the idea itself:
** Set a limit by setting a total number of days in a calendar year during which a property can be let on a short-term basis, with a short-term period defined as any letting for less than 10 days. **