I propose to introduce an allowance for social assistance recipients with special needs. I am thinking here of people who really do have special needs, not of the lazy and the hard-working. The social allowance is probably really in line with the cost of living of people who do not have special needs, but certainly not with people who have special needs.I am only giving an example of coeliac disease below, and there are hundreds more:An adult with coeliac disease is not entitled to any benefits, and gluten-free food is much more expensive than gluten-free food (flour is up to 10 times more expensive). A person with coeliac disease who receives social assistance is not entitled to any benefit because of his or her coeliac disease. She is not allowed to eat gluten because it is poisonous to her, and gluten-free food is either too expensive or eats up money she would need for other emergency expenses. Parents of children with coeliac disease are at least a little better off, because children with coeliac disease are entitled to the care allowance and other special benefits, while adults with coeliac disease are not entitled to any benefits, even if they are entitled to social assistance. I am also not aware of any gluten-free food being made available by the Karitas and the Red Cross, to which the CSDs refer recipients of cash social assistance. I would therefore suggest that the latter should also be regulated.People who are entitled to cash social assistance are entitled to emergency cash social assistance, but this is for EXTRAORDINARY expenses, not regular expenses, such as the above example of gluten-free food.