For several years now, the State has failed in its task of maintaining the country's infrastructure, specifically the road network. When it comes to roads that are more local (but still state-owned), the situation is even worse, with even less money being allocated to areas that are further away from major settlements. Drivers who are forced to drive on such roads suffer damage to their cars, are exposed to a higher risk of accidents, reduced travel speeds, increased tyre wear and tear, and increased fuel consumption. Although all drivers pay all their obligations to the State, which, incidentally, forces us to do so because otherwise we cannot register the vehicle, the State is not doing its duty, that is, maintaining the road network. We drivers contribute enough money to make it possible to maintain the roads in a perfectly solid way, but it is clearly not being used for these purposes. Instead, the State puts warning signs on the roadside and the DRSI says that 'a deteriorating road surface means a lower level of comfort and requires the driver to adjust his speed according to the road conditions' !?! In all this, they both cunningly avoid mentioning the damage that occurs mainly to the undercarriage of vehicles... Prolonged use of roads as worn out as ours causes damage to vehicles much sooner than driving on well-maintained and safe roads would, and the blame for this lies solely with the owner of the infrastructure. As this unsustainable situation has been going on for years, I propose and demand that the state reimburse the cost of repairs to the undercarriageway to those drivers who use roads on a daily basis that have been marked for years with 'bad road' warning signs, because by marking the road in this way, the maintainer is acknowledging that the road is a danger to vehicles and drivers. The criterion could be, say, 3 years, and the information on the placement of the markings should exist with the maintenance companies. This is because, by failing to repair some roads, the state is causing harm to citizens and at the same time depriving certain groups of citizens in comparison with others who can use good, safe and well-maintained roads and do not have such frequent repair costs. In this way, some citizens use the national roads at a lower cost and with a greater degree of safety, while others use them at a higher cost and with a lower degree of safety, creating an inequality that is neither legitimate nor constitutional.