I am referring the proposal back to the public debate because of the inadequate and incomplete response from the Ministry.
I propose to increase disability benefits for those who have been disabled since early childhood.
the lowest disability allowance from the current €146 to at least €300, which is received by all those in category 2, the middle disability allowance from the current €292 to at least €600, which is received by the vast majority of those in category 1 who are entirely dependent on the help of others, and the highest disability allowance, which is currently €418, to at least €850, which is received by almost no-one,
I have checked with ZPIZ that only 540 disabled persons in category 1 are entitled to the maximum benefit, and all the others who are also in category 1, 10316 of them, are only granted the medium disability benefit, although there are many of them who are entirely dependent on others, including someone who has neuromuscular dystrophy, in which the motor nerves and muscles are affected, and whose health deteriorates and who is entirely dependent on the help of others.  
A disabled person who has been disabled since early childhood cannot survive on such a low disability allowance, which is not enough for food per month, let alone for nutritional supplements such as vitamins, special foods, etc.....It bothers me very much that disabled people and social cases are put in the same basket, healthy people will still be able to find a job, but a disabled person will be dependent on the help of others until death and the little money he gets is not even enough for food.And you do not grant them a disability pension, you only grant them a disability allowance because they have been disabled since childhood and have never had a job or worked.It also disturbs me that you give the institutions 4000 euros a month and more for people with disabilities who live with them and are 100% disabled, and barely 292 euros a month for people with disabilities who are 100% disabled and live at home, plus a little for care and assistance at home,which is overwhelmingly done by parents who have to be available to their disabled children 24 hours a day because disabled people need constant help with everything, even the toilet, and because, for example, a mother cannot afford to have a job, and because an assistant is considerably too expensive, and because the disabled person has to pay for it himself, and there would be nothing left of the disability allowance and the care allowance. 
Often the whole family depends on the income of the disabled child, because the person who cares for the disabled person, i.e. in most cases the mother, cannot have a job and has no income of her own, and the worst situation is in single-parent families,
If a disabled person lives in an institution, the state gives the institution considerably more money for the disabled person, even up to 4000 euros and even more, without any problem, and I wonder why you have double criteria for disabled people, because are not all people equal and do not they need the same care, because those disabled people who live at home also need the same care as those who live in institutions? Therefore, I would also suggest that you reduce the allowance for disabled people in institutions to the same level as for disabled people living at home, and you will see that the employees in institutions will immediately rebel and say that it is not possible to care for disabled people with so little money, so I really do not know how a disabled person living at home and his parents can survive with considerably less money.
1-I suggest that you equalise the income between disabled people living in institutions and those living at home to the same level, by reducing the contributions to institutions for the care of disabled people and allocating the difference to those disabled people living at home, because all disabled people are equal, or at least that is the way it should be, and yet they would not incur any additional financial costs.
2-To introduce some kind of record of how many disabled children live in institutions and how many live at home, because the institutions are now making a very good living at the expense of disabled children.
3-I wonder how much of the money that you give to institutions for the care of disabled people goes to the disabled child personally, or to the age of 26 when he or she can still be in an institution, or is it all collected by the employees of the institutions?
4-To abolish the funding of disabled people's organisations and to abolish most of them, which make a very good living on behalf of disabled people, who for the most part have nothing to show for it, except those who sit at the trough, and disabled people even have to pay membership fees out of their disability allowance, and the money that is collected from gambling is instead given directly to disabled people so that they at least have something to show for it.
As an example, a disabled person who has neuromuscular dystrophy and whose motor nerves and muscles are dying should automatically be placed in category 1 the first time he or she goes to the disability commission, because such a disease or medical condition only gets worse.
Ps also some disabled people you refuse to grant disability benefits at all and they are in category 1 or 2 I know for example he has epilepsy and is mentally retarded such a person will certainly never be able to live independently let alone work and you prefer to give him low social assistance instead of disability benefits and then his mother has to apply for social assistance every few months,and now he doesn't get it if they own something like a small forest which is worth nothing and can't even be sold, and now he gets nothing except some care allowance and he is not entitled to social assistance, and they refuse to give him disability benefits even though he is in category 2.
www.mddsz.gov.si/si/delovna_podrocja/sociala/nadomestilo_za_invalidnos...
I would ask you not to make excuses for existing laws again like you do with all the other proposals on this site, so I really don't know why you even want our proposals if you don't take them into account, aren't they proposals for changing existing laws for the better for all of us?