Hello,
In some sectors, it is possible to work full-time for up to 8 hours a week. (Exceptionally, a full-time worker may enter into a part-time employment contract with another employer, but for a maximum of eight hours per week, with the prior agreement of the employers with whom he is employed full-time, if the occupation is one of deficit occupations according to the employment service or one of educational, cultural-artistic or research work.) Such supplementary work is a regular practice in most educational and research establishments. People who are primarily employed in the economy may also be employed, and there are quite a few who come from the political ranks.
In an era when jobs are scarce, I believe that such recruitment is complete nonsense. The day is equally long for all citizens, and if you do your 40-hour week conscientiously and responsibly, you run out of energy to do any other work. This exception in the law supports the service of those who have nothing to do in their working hours or have plenty of time and energy left over for other activities. We must be aware that there are many people with the relevant education and skills who are registered with the Employment Service, while others are doing several jobs and duties at the same time (which is, of course, questionable in terms of the quality of the work done). I therefore propose that this article be removed from the Employment Relations Act. I have an even better proposal. The Employment Service has a database of the unemployed. If there is someone with a relevant qualification registered at a particular unit of the Employment Service who is unemployed, it is not possible to conclude a supplementary employment relationship. Since the institutions that can provide supplementary employment are in most cases public institutions, which have to publish the need for a worker with the Employment Service, the matter would be resolved at the moment the need for a worker is submitted to the Employment Service. The establishment immediately notifies the institution of the details of one (or more) suitable staff. The institution selects one or more. It may also select someone else, but on a regular (possibly part-time) rather than a supplementary basis. The only person needed to prepare such an application is a good IT programmer and the Institute has no additional work to do. It would certainly have fewer unemployed people. This would also make the submission of labour needs more transparent, as today the vast majority of public institutions do not make their labour needs public (even if it is compulsory).
In the above-mentioned institutions, it would also be necessary to make it impossible to recruit on a sub-contract or contract basis those who are regularly employed by the institution on a fixed or permanent basis. Those who are on contract could not still work on a subcontract or contract basis. In certain cases, author contracts and subcontracting are based on the short duration of the projects or on the increased need for workers in a given school or academic year. However, this is just an excuse. During that school or study year, when there is an increased need, or during the duration of a particular project, someone who is unemployed would at least get temporary employment. In this way, the number of unemployed would be reduced (at least for a certain period), the unemployed would get relevant experience and they would work. It is true, however, that some people who could no longer fill their pockets in this way (through regular work + supplementary work + author/subcontracting) would be disadvantaged.