Hello,
Pension policy does not take into account people who are in some way receiving social contributions in an undue way. Unmanaged in the sense that these people claim that they do not want to go to work in any way. Verified - I personally know of 2 cases where this is the case. It has also been reported in the media that a family of 3 has more social benefits than a family of 3 where at least one member works. So those who are working will have to work longer and longer to get their pensions with the new pensions policy, while at the same time we have more and more people who could work but don't want to, and manage to get social benefits. I personally know that such a person, for example, gets a newly renovated flat, for which he pays no rent, gets a social contribution, and lives modestly but comfortably, on a new sofa, in a warm flat (about 43 m3), with a new lcd screen, etc.
Not all recipients of social contributions are in the same position, some are really managed to them. But how many of those who could work, are salaried, but under the cover of excuses do not work, and have no intention of ever working.
I propose that through some state mechanism (at municipal level) people be appointed to check the correctness of the social contribution. If it is found that such a person could work and thus fill the state coffers, instead of receiving from the state indefinitely, that person should be actively involved in finding a job (statistics say that there is a shortage of certain profiles of professionals, but it is a pity that only such people receive the social contribution, instead of being in regular employment, because they are able to do so). The unemployment rate may rise, but the percentage of people on social benefits will fall, and so will the warning to others that you have to work to get a pension. However, if the state extends the time limit for pensions, it will also be at the expense of those who are not receiving social benefits properly but are able to work.
I will hardly write a definitive systemic solution myself, but I have pointed to the guidelines for such a solution.