Hello,
Pension policy does not take into account people who are in some way receiving social contributions in an undue way. Unmanaged in the sense that these people claim that they do not want to go to work in any way. Verified - I personally know of 2 cases where this is the case. It has also been reported in the media that a family of 3 has more social benefits than a family of 3 where at least one member works. So those who are working will have to work longer and longer to get their pensions with the new pensions policy, but at the same time we have more and more people who could work but don't want to, and manage to get social benefits. I personally know that such a person, for example, gets a newly renovated flat, for which he pays no rent, gets a social contribution, and lives modestly but comfortably, on a new sofa, in a warm flat (about 43 m3), with a new lcd screen, etc.
Not all recipients of social contributions are in the same position, some are really managed to them. But how many of those who could work, are salaried, but under the cover of excuses do not work, and have no intention of ever working.
At the same time, the number of employees in such state offices is not going to increase either, so there is no possibility of there being a team of people to check these things. There are no mechanisms, so it is all an end in itself, and that has long been a systemic flaw that perhaps no one wants to point out. Now is the time to bring pension policy into line with all the parameters, to make it as socially just as possible, as far as possible, for everyone.